A Real Life "Confederacy of Dunces"

Your humble Colonel had thought he was quite close to being at a loss for words.  The levels to which the occupant of the Oval Office has sunk, as he seems to head, with breakneck speed toward ... what?  Even my nemesis, FDR, for all his warped vision of what this country should become, had limits.

But this ... this parody of a President ... this twenty-first century Nero ...

If he is nothing more then a fool who is well and truly above their station in life, perhaps there would be some sort of recourse.  Even a fool, at some point must listen to reason, admit they are out of their league, turn the reigns of power over to others.

Sadly, I am of the opinion, though he may be foolish, he is not a fool.  Rather,  Obama is what he is,  evil.   No, not the kind of evil found in horror stories, monsters attacking unsuspecting villagers.  Or the despots along the lines of Mao, or Pol Pot, whose evil was clear, plain to see by even the most casual observer of the world stage.

Obama's evil is the most insidious, and vile.  For not only does he not consider himself to be evil, neither does he feel what he is doing (or proposes to do) is wrong in the least.   And wither it is a willful ignorance on his part or that which comes from having to believe in the lie which is modern day liberalism, matters not.

I imagine most of the people he asked to accept positions with in his cabinet, or to become heads of various agencies, that declined the offers, did so not only to cover their own backsides.   Some of them had to be aware of what Obama, his administration, and both the Senate and House, were going to do with this country.  If not the specifics, at least the overall gist of what was to come.   And what little conscience, soul, or love of country, cried out.  And they listened to it.

At least what little optimist still resides in me, would like to believe that's true.

So, dear reader, you wonder why I have been away for these past few weeks?  Why there have been no comments on what seems to be the ever increasing tide of what can only be described as insanity, by our elected officials of every stripe?

Maybe it's the way in which Obama treats our allies when they come to visit

Then there is the actions of our newly minted Secretary of State, as she trapes across the mid-east, and the former Soviet Socialist Republic

And there is always the diversion tactic.  Attacking those who would speak candidly about your policies, procedures, and goals. Especially when your sycophantic press corp is always ready to follow your lead in matters such as this.


Then there are my personal top three favorites (subject to change):

    * Government Bailout of Major Banks, Insurance Corps, and Lending Institutions.
    * Proposal to have Veterans pay for treatment of injuries.
    * House Bill HR875 - Controlling all aspects of production/processing of foodstuffs - Effectively killing off the independent farmer/farmer's markets/organic farming.


Individually, non of these would have been mind numbing enough to stop me from commenting.  My mistake, was in waiting to see how this "President" and his administration would fare in their first 100 days.  Sadly, and perhaps all too predictably, he has shown the people of this great nation, along with friends and enemies, world wide, he is nothing more then a poser.  A cardboard cutout, of a man, a leader, a president.   And we are far worse then being poorer for it.  Our civilization, our American way of life, is heading full steam toward oblivion, self induced extinction.

Individually, non of the above examples would be enough to accomplish this. (Cripple, yes, but we as a people are resilient enough to make it through any one of the above calamities.)  But collectively, repairing the damages caused by these actions is a task even Sisyphus would have shied away from.   And thus my pen was stilled.  My anger, outrage, and pain, raw and open to close to the heart.  Words failed.

And so I stare with disbelief at the arrogance, hubris, and ignorance being openly displayed on almost a daily basis from our elected officials and their agents.   Numbed to the very core of my spectral being.  And at long last, find a sense of urgency strong enough to breach any and all emotions which had held my pen at bay.

For at the executive level, Nero fiddles anew!  And as for (a curse on!!!) both your Houses ... We need not fear the barbarians outside, for the legislative barbarians from within are keen to open the gates for them.

I remain, ever spinning,

The Colonel

Crossposted at Colonel McCormick's Spin, and here with "The Colonel's" blessings.

 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 3/18/2009 8:17 PM Dick wrote:
    From Wikipedia,

    "During the Reign of Terror, at the height of the French Revolution, Marie Antoinette's husband was deposed and the royal family was imprisoned. Marie Antoinette was tried, convicted of treason and executed by guillotine on 16 October 1793, nine months after her husband.

    In popular culture, the phrase "Let them eat cake" is often attributed to Marie Antoinette."


    I'm waiting my turn.
    Reply to this
  • 3/18/2009 9:29 PM mts1 wrote:
    HR 875 still has me shell shocked, too. If you have a backyard garden, and don't do their bidding, you can get fined AND have your property confiscated?

    My question is, can rulings be appealed to court, or is it Agency Law whose rulings are final, where Howard Stern got fined $1M and couldn't fight it in court, or even get told what exactly he did to deserve the fine?

    I can't grow my own tomatoes and bell peppers? My grandparents loved every breath they took here, for they weren't stuck back in what became communist lands where s**t like this WAS law. They had 50x150 gardens so they could can up a storm and feed their families like kings all year from the basement jar stock during a Depression, and not have the Lord of the land or a soviet official interfere.

    Are there any sharks left in the ocean for these people to jump? I am a federal scofflaw who can lose his property if I have a damn tomato plant. Oooooohhhhhh!!!
    Reply to this
  • 3/19/2009 8:46 AM james wilson wrote:
    Omama is performing a vital service, like the hyena. It is not his weakness that is at issue, but ours. This has been growing for a very long time, but is now in the open through his magnificence.
    Bugs, once feeling safe traveling in the light, provide for their own solution.
    Reply to this
  • 3/22/2009 7:44 PM gingeroni wrote:
    It looks like 875 was replace with 1332, the "Safe FEAST Act", Safe Food Enforcement, Assessment, Standards, and Targeting Act of 2009.

    I don't see anything that would apply to something the size of a farmers' market but there's nothing to exclude them either. The whole thing is huge and basically amends current enacted law so you have to have the current law in front of you to analyze the changes.
    Reply to this
  • 3/22/2009 8:54 PM Guy S wrote:
    gingeroni,

    "I don't see anything that would apply to something the size of a farmers' market but there's nothing to exclude them either. The whole thing is huge and basically amends current enacted law so you have to have the current law in front of you to analyze the changes."


    And that is the biggest problem I have with this whole mess. (And other "bills" which seek to hide either what they intend to do, or what they may choose to do at some later more convenient date.

    How can we expect even the most well meaning and staunch supporter of his (or her) constituents to be able to weed through all the bs to get at the heart of the matter on any given piece of legislation. Let alone some of us "common folk" trying to do the same. Especially when you usually only have a handful of days to do the research before it is voted on. (ala the "stimulus package).
    Reply to this
  • 7/30/2009 7:40 AM Income Protection wrote:
    Great post i shall be bookmarking this site for sure!
    Reply to this
  • 8/31/2009 5:13 PM Jonathan wrote:
    "A cardboard cutout, of a man, a leader, a president. And we are far worse then being poorer for it."

    Dude don't you think that is a little harse.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.